"A child can always teach an adult three things: to be happy for no reason, to always be busy with some What, with all his might and claim what he wants "to " .
Paulo Coelho
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Adorys Velazquez Wedding
but you, who do you think you are?
I am back from holidays. I spare you the guide of my reporters wonderful week in Hvar, but the first post after the holidays could not bypass all of my experience of the last 10 days. And that is why I find myself thinking about a topic that I felt much debate among my friends, that is: we judge what is frivolous? We distinguish a surface by a person who is not?
Needless to tell that whenever you approach the subject, I was catapulted into a pseudo-Platonic dialogue, where the most vied to give his definition.
The first step was to review all the things that are judged to be frivolous, as if the superficiality was a major attribute of a thing rather than another. The second one, perhaps more acute, but not all were able to follow, was to confer the status of "frivolous" depending on what motivates a person to a certain attitude or something. And inevitably the third step was to put the tragic examples of specific cases of people known ... We were wrong, in my opinion, if the real intent is to define something objectively.
Whether you're talking about cosmetic surgery, that's football, video games or fashion, television or politics, see people around me so sure of his ideas I was very surprised ... I was also really well until a few years ago, but life experiences have taught me to deal with much more humility my ideas, my thoughts ( wise is he who knows he does not know , said Socrates) and my opinions. Yes, even my opinions, because I was not ever agree with those who say it is wrong to judge ... And why? Kant said that the proceedings is the union of a predicate and a person using a copula . Rate it means, therefore, think, express their own ideas on something. What is wrong with that, I never understood. Not the opinion that scares me ... rather it is the sentence!
Anyway, back to the definition of what is frivolous ... the two major difficulties I seemed to detect in the discussion concerned the neutral or negative meaning of the "frivolous" and the classic short-circuit which fall all those who have little familiarity with the philosophy:) ... or the distinction of part of the whole. The fact that I am shallow in some areas of life, makes me a person completely frivolous, or a bad person? E 'can be superficial in some ways, but very profound for others?
... and you how are you? :) 
I am back from holidays. I spare you the guide of my reporters wonderful week in Hvar, but the first post after the holidays could not bypass all of my experience of the last 10 days. And that is why I find myself thinking about a topic that I felt much debate among my friends, that is: we judge what is frivolous? We distinguish a surface by a person who is not?
Needless to tell that whenever you approach the subject, I was catapulted into a pseudo-Platonic dialogue, where the most vied to give his definition.
The first step was to review all the things that are judged to be frivolous, as if the superficiality was a major attribute of a thing rather than another. The second one, perhaps more acute, but not all were able to follow, was to confer the status of "frivolous" depending on what motivates a person to a certain attitude or something. And inevitably the third step was to put the tragic examples of specific cases of people known ... We were wrong, in my opinion, if the real intent is to define something objectively.
Whether you're talking about cosmetic surgery, that's football, video games or fashion, television or politics, see people around me so sure of his ideas I was very surprised ... I was also really well until a few years ago, but life experiences have taught me to deal with much more humility my ideas, my thoughts ( wise is he who knows he does not know , said Socrates) and my opinions. Yes, even my opinions, because I was not ever agree with those who say it is wrong to judge ... And why? Kant said that the proceedings is the union of a predicate and a person using a copula . Rate it means, therefore, think, express their own ideas on something. What is wrong with that, I never understood. Not the opinion that scares me ... rather it is the sentence!
Anyway, back to the definition of what is frivolous ... the two major difficulties I seemed to detect in the discussion concerned the neutral or negative meaning of the "frivolous" and the classic short-circuit which fall all those who have little familiarity with the philosophy:) ... or the distinction of part of the whole. The fact that I am shallow in some areas of life, makes me a person completely frivolous, or a bad person? E 'can be superficial in some ways, but very profound for others?
... and you how are you? :)
Friday, August 6, 2010
Tricare Car Warranty Ontario
her that 'the world at random places ...
The mood in recent days seems to have washed away with the rain - in the face of meteoropathy - and we arrived at last Friday ... (Ok, so now just bad weather eh!)
These are days of preparation: there are those who prepares for the upcoming holidays and who - like my friends - for the weekend of the summer's most anticipated: the "Celtic Montelago Night "...
Unfortunately even be able to see me this year in Colfiorito: beginning to think it is the fault of fate! Obviously it's just a saying. I do not believe in destiny, I find absurd the idea of \u200b\u200ba future in some predetermined way, by "someone". When I speak on this topic I think the answer always comes back to my old friend the question: "Do you believe in fate or in the case?" He said: " and what changes? In both cases what will happen to me I still unknown." Irrefutable wisdom!
However, the coincidence of the case, sometimes, are so well embedded that it looks "fake" a certain thing ... and this is a clear example of how the attributes before being in the things themselves, are in our eyes. We look, for example, as the wisdom of the East has tried in its own way, to disentangle the concept of "destiny". Let's talk about karma , or that beginning universal need, "according to which any voluntary action of man he is equal to another (in the" quality "or positive or negative ) and opposite (in the" receiving "or from me into the world - from the world to me ). In spite of the most basic laws of physics on the attraction of the "opposite", enter the universe of positive energy will come back to us something positive, enter the negative we will procure something negative. This theory I Like, convinces me more than any other religious theory "Western" on the "good" and "evil." And this because it gives us the power in the hands of the "fate" and not someone else that decides for us. Obviously then there are limits: there is an immutable and absolute truth and that everything that exists is subject to change: in this case, man is destined to die. On this we can not choose, but in hindsight, the reason for this "insurmountable limit" is not external to us, but inherent in our nature. For our nature we can not decide whether to be mortal or immortal, but would like Gandalf the Grey: " we can only decide what to do with the time it is granted . Throughout history many aberrations
"moral" were born and, sadly, which have become our common feeling, also because of the "destiny". Some of these are " sin "(which leads to the" guilt ") and" sacrifice .
But talk about this now I would be more "long" to what I want.
Finally, is there something that prevents me, year after year to spend the first weekend of August in a tent in nature, Celtic music and rivers of beer? And if that something can not be destiny, is perhaps the karma, or something I'm avoiding me? But no, definitely not. The last few years was, first because of my ex-boyfriend, then the holiday this year ... and just recovering from the fever and the fear of relapse before the holidays:)
Have fun! 
 |
| We often encounter in our own destiny on the road taken to avoid |
These are days of preparation: there are those who prepares for the upcoming holidays and who - like my friends - for the weekend of the summer's most anticipated: the "Celtic Montelago Night "...
Unfortunately even be able to see me this year in Colfiorito: beginning to think it is the fault of fate! Obviously it's just a saying. I do not believe in destiny, I find absurd the idea of \u200b\u200ba future in some predetermined way, by "someone". When I speak on this topic I think the answer always comes back to my old friend the question: "Do you believe in fate or in the case?" He said: " and what changes? In both cases what will happen to me I still unknown." Irrefutable wisdom!
However, the coincidence of the case, sometimes, are so well embedded that it looks "fake" a certain thing ... and this is a clear example of how the attributes before being in the things themselves, are in our eyes. We look, for example, as the wisdom of the East has tried in its own way, to disentangle the concept of "destiny". Let's talk about karma , or that beginning universal need, "according to which any voluntary action of man he is equal to another (in the" quality "or positive or negative ) and opposite (in the" receiving "or from me into the world - from the world to me ). In spite of the most basic laws of physics on the attraction of the "opposite", enter the universe of positive energy will come back to us something positive, enter the negative we will procure something negative. This theory I Like, convinces me more than any other religious theory "Western" on the "good" and "evil." And this because it gives us the power in the hands of the "fate" and not someone else that decides for us. Obviously then there are limits: there is an immutable and absolute truth and that everything that exists is subject to change: in this case, man is destined to die. On this we can not choose, but in hindsight, the reason for this "insurmountable limit" is not external to us, but inherent in our nature. For our nature we can not decide whether to be mortal or immortal, but would like Gandalf the Grey: " we can only decide what to do with the time it is granted . Throughout history many aberrations
"moral" were born and, sadly, which have become our common feeling, also because of the "destiny". Some of these are " sin "(which leads to the" guilt ") and" sacrifice .
But talk about this now I would be more "long" to what I want.
Finally, is there something that prevents me, year after year to spend the first weekend of August in a tent in nature, Celtic music and rivers of beer? And if that something can not be destiny, is perhaps the karma, or something I'm avoiding me? But no, definitely not. The last few years was, first because of my ex-boyfriend, then the holiday this year ... and just recovering from the fever and the fear of relapse before the holidays:)
Have fun!
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Mood Disorders More Condition_symptoms
I'm really down and I can not get up the morale ... god, how sad!
Maybe it will be the fault of the antibiotics I am taking, but he can not lift even the thought that in less than 10 days I'll be on vacation ...
So today I write to further depress me, but will report a story that I found curious ...
Lucifer Effect: How the good people become bad.
In 1971, social psychologist Philip Zimbardo at Stanford and professor selected a group of students who, for two weeks, $ 15 days, simulating the conditions of a prison. The children were chosen on the basis of simple requirements: good health and good mental and physical balance. In case some people had to immerse themselves in the role of the guard in that of other inmates. They were all children of the middle class in Palo Alto, students in one of the most prestigious American universitiesAll participants, therefore, were volunteers who were told what would happen. They were free to ask to stop the experiment at any time and they knew perfectly well that it was a scientific simulation from the University. To make it more likely, the boys were arrested Sunday morning by a real team of police, who followed the procedures in case of arrest realistic and house break-ins were recorded by a professional cameraman.
Then began the detention, followed closely by the study group Zimbardo with constant television coverage. The boys-guards immediately began to implement the behavior of growing psychological violence. Threats, dehumanization, isolation, sexual humiliation. After 36 hours, five out of nine prisoners began to show signs of nervous breakdown. The experiment was discontinued on the sixth day, because he had gone out of control. From those six days
Philip Zimbardo, more than thirty years, has drawn a book essential to understanding the nature of evil. It's called The Lucifer Effect: Understanding how good people turn evil in Italy and was published in 2008 by Cambridge University in the series of Psychology. The book is a lesson on the nature of evil and part of a crucial assumption: the Evil is the exercise of power, evil was born blind obedience to power. In short, anyone, even you who think you are incapable of evil, can discover in certain circumstances, of being an "agent of Evil" or of being a "pawn of evil," indifferent to its unfolding, to stop too passive or too conformist to recognize it, or as a third hypothesis, to be a normal person who acts heroically at the right time, that is different from the masses. Recognize the evil and resists. And it does so for the Common Good, not for himself.
And again: the Evil is almost never the individual, but in systems. This is the reflection of Zimbardo it should hit more: from within a system, very few have the moral strength, dignity and firmness to say no. It also means System for only certain ingrained patterns of thought, leading us all, except a few "deviant" to let things go as they go instead to change them ...
Monday, August 2, 2010
Fotos De Patricia Nabidad
mood on the ground like flies buzzing in my head ...
someone said, "How jealous, I suffer four times because they are jealous, because I reproach of it, because I fear that my jealousy end up hurting each other, I am very emotional subdue a banality: I suffer from being excluded, to be aggressive, to be mad and be like everyone else others ... or worse, I would add.
It 's our human nature that condemns us to necessarily be jealous of what we love?
I do not think, because many people are not. I was I did not either until a few year ago and I was proud ... What has changed, I would not know to explain.
However I can do to me or not I was provoked.
's not so much for fear of losing it, because I trust him.
is not excessive for a sense of ownership, because this is just a feeling that is not mine.
Simply, some looks, smiles, jokes, hugs my man reserve them for me and no other.
And this does not mean, mind you, claim the sole of his life: I could not imagine anything more abhorrent. In addition, if so, I was jealous of anyone interacting with him. But it's not, they are jealous of the girls there are in less than a palm of your hand ...
Mine is a jealous envy that someone else who shares some of my man who is often unable to get even for me. Probably it's all because of some of my insecurities, I realize there is something that you do not have, but I see in other ... But maybe also some unfortunate coincidences that lead me to think that, on the other hand, the respect for me or what I feel is inadvertently overlooked by the natural pursuit of personal pleasure ... and this is not malice, but because something that someone else has and I can not give clear that he is searching for him, you see ... I do not know how not to be frightened by this. He calls her friend and asks me what's wrong ... how to respond? ... That is I think that this can not or can not give him, friendship? A lively, friendly, outgoing and free and easy? Or an incredibly sexy body? And are worthless assurances that he is with me, not with another ... doubt that because if someone else had come forward before me it would surely have had to if I have it and it is difficult to erase ...
Some say that there is no love without a little 'jealousy ... maybe this is my "little'"... who knows what his ... Recently I have been unable to see it or noticing it ... maybe he is much better than me, or a better person why not try some little things ... and anyway I did not ever happy to show my love, indeed, has the unbeatable ability to make me suffer more, when you notice or talk about it ... for the series: "Love means helping each other ..." I think he means only the jealousy as "incazzatura of treason" and I can not explain that to me is not so ... What should worry about this resentment toward my "fear of losing it"? I would not want to fear that our love is not "perfect" is really me to crack ... Aw, Snap! A holiday "quiet" this year no, eh? :)
It 's our human nature that condemns us to necessarily be jealous of what we love?
I do not think, because many people are not. I was I did not either until a few year ago and I was proud ... What has changed, I would not know to explain.
However I can do to me or not I was provoked.
's not so much for fear of losing it, because I trust him.
is not excessive for a sense of ownership, because this is just a feeling that is not mine.
Simply, some looks, smiles, jokes, hugs my man reserve them for me and no other.
And this does not mean, mind you, claim the sole of his life: I could not imagine anything more abhorrent. In addition, if so, I was jealous of anyone interacting with him. But it's not, they are jealous of the girls there are in less than a palm of your hand ...
Mine is a jealous envy that someone else who shares some of my man who is often unable to get even for me. Probably it's all because of some of my insecurities, I realize there is something that you do not have, but I see in other ... But maybe also some unfortunate coincidences that lead me to think that, on the other hand, the respect for me or what I feel is inadvertently overlooked by the natural pursuit of personal pleasure ... and this is not malice, but because something that someone else has and I can not give clear that he is searching for him, you see ... I do not know how not to be frightened by this. He calls her friend and asks me what's wrong ... how to respond? ... That is I think that this can not or can not give him, friendship? A lively, friendly, outgoing and free and easy? Or an incredibly sexy body? And are worthless assurances that he is with me, not with another ... doubt that because if someone else had come forward before me it would surely have had to if I have it and it is difficult to erase ...
Some say that there is no love without a little 'jealousy ... maybe this is my "little'"... who knows what his ... Recently I have been unable to see it or noticing it ... maybe he is much better than me, or a better person why not try some little things ... and anyway I did not ever happy to show my love, indeed, has the unbeatable ability to make me suffer more, when you notice or talk about it ... for the series: "Love means helping each other ..." I think he means only the jealousy as "incazzatura of treason" and I can not explain that to me is not so ... What should worry about this resentment toward my "fear of losing it"? I would not want to fear that our love is not "perfect" is really me to crack ... Aw, Snap! A holiday "quiet" this year no, eh? :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)